World of Warcraft

80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Wildhammer
  • 0. Unimpressed with the Q&A?   10/06/2009 16:05:15 PDT
quote locked
Hey pals, long time player fresh dinged shaman.

No thoughts or feelings needed, if you agree with the title then do this.






/signed
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Runetotem
  • 1. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   10/06/2009 16:48:40 PDT
quote locked
It wasn't technical enough. It didn't address our in-depth PvE or PvP issues, except totem stomping, and even that was vague.

I have a signature... wheee.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 2. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   10/06/2009 17:20:56 PDT
quote locked
Agree.. Also when he discussed the roles - he basically said nothing.. He said he wanted all specs to be competetive .. WOAH that was unexpected .. i mean that was just stupid..

As previous poster said, no in depth responses.. i will say the 4 totems at once will be nice, but they said they would fix totems already back in tbc, and nothing ever happened..

The only 2 things we actually got from the Q&A, was - in patch 3.2 we will get our currently lower base health increased.. and "in the future" we will get all 4 totems in 1 gcd somehow..

Basically he could've have written:
In respons to the questions regarding "insert random problem", we will be sure to analyse the problem further and perhaps fix it in a future patch.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Auchindoun
  • 3. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   10/06/2009 17:32:29 PDT
quote locked
If you want this thread to survive you wont ask people to sign it.

The Q&A lacked substance. If they had given true answers, even if I didn't like them, I would've accepted them. Instead they came in to tell Shamans how they evolved (or rather, didn't) over time. Yeah no @%*! sherlock, we've all witnessed it.

As I said in the Q&A thread, I'm not falling for the PR stunt as I foolishly did going from Vanilla->TBC-Wrath. If nothing happens, I will leave, period. There's other stuff out there to play now. Though if I leave, it wont be alone, and it sure as hell wont be quietly. I'll catalog every intention, plan, promise or 'feeling', the income revenue over the period of time until now, the cost of putting a team of coders to work for one week to fix things, and send it to every single media outlet I know. I'm that much of a bastard.
73
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
Ket
  • Ravenholdt
  • 4. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   10/06/2009 20:43:14 PDT
quote locked

Q u o t e:
It wasn't technical enough. It didn't address our in-depth PvE or PvP issues, except totem stomping, and even that was vague.


Blizz have learned their lesson about the WoW community not being able to take specifics. Because things change, and when they do the community rants and cries about being lied to.

Osmosis is only a theory!

Magic Diffusion, teach the controversy!
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 5. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   10/06/2009 21:48:31 PDT
quote locked
The Q&A was horrible. : |


Q u o t e:
If the judge says he’s unconvinced and your response is that the judge is ignoring the obvious or is a poopyhead, then you’ll probably be going to jail.

GC <3
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Wildhammer
  • 6. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   11/06/2009 00:22:48 PDT
quote locked

Q u o t e:
If you want this thread to survive you wont ask people to sign it.

The Q&A lacked substance. If they had given true answers, even if I didn't like them, I would've accepted them. Instead they came in to tell Shamans how they evolved (or rather, didn't) over time. Yeah no @%*! sherlock, we've all witnessed it.

As I said in the Q&A thread, I'm not falling for the PR stunt as I foolishly did going from Vanilla->TBC-Wrath. If nothing happens, I will leave, period. There's other stuff out there to play now. Though if I leave, it wont be alone, and it sure as hell wont be quietly. I'll catalog every intention, plan, promise or 'feeling', the income revenue over the period of time until now, the cost of putting a team of coders to work for one week to fix things, and send it to every single media outlet I know. I'm that much of a bastard.


Better to be asked than told! I like your thinking also.

I'm not going for the sign my thread just because, i just want something here showing that they failed and we are unimpressed. I'm more hurt if anything.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Emerald Dream
  • 7. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   11/06/2009 01:50:58 PDT
quote locked

Q u o t e:
It wasn't technical enough. It didn't address our in-depth PvE or PvP issues, except totem stomping, and even that was vague.


It was to be expected, given how they end up shooting themselves in the foot if they go into too much detail.
But knowing the general design direction is quite useful IMO. Mostly it allows people to say "Yeah, that sounds cool" or "Nah, I'll better reroll now".

Because now everyone is on a common ground about where the class will go in the future.

SQUEAK.
-- (The Death of Rats, Terry Pratchett, Soul Music)
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Twisting Nether
  • 8. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   11/06/2009 02:05:15 PDT
quote locked
I would've liked it if they actually listed the current problems of the class (even the problems where we're too good. Ok. Stop laughing. STOP. LAUGHING), and their thoughts about it.

Instead, they kept on talking about totems having 5hp, using lots of words to say absolutely nothing at all..


TBH, just what I expected ^^
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 9. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   11/06/2009 02:31:49 PDT
quote locked
If you people expected full blown patch notes it's no wonder you are unimpressed. They actually did provide us some sneak peaks into the next patch.

Poster above 'i would like it if they showed the current problems of the class'. I'd be disappointed too reading stuff with my eyes closed. Or are you just blind?

They touched on:

-mobility
-earth shield
-mana tide
-pve mana
-chain heal
-totem stomping
-4 totems in 1 GCD (very minor buff tbh)
-nerfs to the other healers mana (a net gain in power)

I'd say this is a very nice sneak peak into 3.2 patch notes, that they never said this would be.

Contemplating the whole "chosen people" thingy when a flaming stealth banana split the sky like one would hope but never really expect to see in a place like this.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 10. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   11/06/2009 02:40:27 PDT
quote locked
As Shaman best u can do is brace for the worst and take anything else as a bonus.

If all else fails, at least we will come out of this with a new icon for Lighting Bolt or something.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Auchindoun
  • 11. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   11/06/2009 04:33:31 PDT
quote locked

Q u o t e:
If you people expected full blown patch notes it's no wonder you are unimpressed. They actually did provide us some sneak peaks into the next patch.

Poster above 'i would like it if they showed the current problems of the class'. I'd be disappointed too reading stuff with my eyes closed. Or are you just blind?

They touched on:

-mobility
-earth shield
-mana tide
-pve mana
-chain heal
-totem stomping
-4 totems in 1 GCD (very minor buff tbh)
-nerfs to the other healers mana (a net gain in power)

I'd say this is a very nice sneak peak into 3.2 patch notes, that they never said this would be.
No Senjaka, you make the classic Shaman mistake, which is going to leave you disappointed, not the ones demanding answers. Throughout the whole Q&A post there's this thin red line. It's "may", "plan to", "feel" and using phrases as "in the longterm". Then, more specifically there's this;


Q u o t e:
As always, we’re unsure of how many of these changes we will get in for the 3.2 patch. We’re trying to keep the list of class changes down compared to 3.1, where some players felt whiplash from so many frequent and sometimes substantial changes to their class.
If anything, they're going to keep us waiting for another patch, and another one, and another one, and then we need to shell out 40 bucks for another expansion that's poorly beta tested. Then you'll find other classes have yet again advanced faster than we have. And so the endless circlejerk ensues.

The only way to stop this cycle is by giving concrete ideas and answers, and implementing them ASAP with full priority, so that we're back up to date with the rest of the classes. Even if that means it wont be changes we like, at least we'll know what we're getting ourselves into. This Q&A is vague and nothing more than a poorly constructed PR stunt that may have worked if they were George W. Bush but not for anyone else.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 12. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   11/06/2009 04:59:40 PDT
quote locked
It is vague because it seems most of you expected a slew of patch notes full of concrete answers. If you want that you'll have to wait for the actual new patch.

As far as a Q&A is concerned, i've gotten alot of insight in the planned changes. Whether Blizzard has a hidden masterplan of making Shamans suffer for as long as they can until we all reroll or quit, we'll just have to find that out by next patch wont we.

Even if only half of the changes make it in 3.2 if that comes along with nerfs to other classes (winnervate) that will bring us up alot more than you think. I do hate having to suck for ANOTHER arena season tho. Earth Shield dispell thing and higher Mana Tide HP should get hotfixed in asap.

Contemplating the whole "chosen people" thingy when a flaming stealth banana split the sky like one would hope but never really expect to see in a place like this.
Blizzard Entertainment
View All Posts by This User ignore-inactive
Wryxian
Blizzard Poster
  • 13. Re: Unimpressed with the Q&A?   11/06/2009 05:02:51 PDT
quote locked
If you want to pass on your feedback on the Q&A, please do it in the Q&A thread.


Q u o t e:
“Petition” posts are frowned on

This is a discussion forum. Petition threads do not contain much discussion – instead, a petition is usually page after page of “/signed.” This is not constructive. If you have an issue with the game, please discuss it in a civil fashion. There are other places on the internet to form online petitions.

"The lives of my fallen comrades will not be in vain, and I shall avenge their deaths using the Scythe of Elune."

Community Team - English
Forum Nav : Jump To This Forum
Blizzard Entertainment