World of Warcraft

80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Blade's Edge
  • 0. Ditch minor glyphs, or give us better ones.   13/10/2009 06:43:44 PDT
quote locked
I don't see the need for most, if not all, minor glyphs. Why dont Blizzard just scap the three minor ones and give us an extra major one then change all glyph types to just glyphs.

Edit: Can I get this moved to the suggestions forum please?

[ Post edited by Someoneelse ]

80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Argent Dawn
  • 1. Re: Ditch minor glyphs, or give us better ones.   13/10/2009 06:48:59 PDT
quote locked
But.. glyph of penguin.

Your ad here.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 2. Re: Ditch minor glyphs, or give us better ones.   13/10/2009 06:50:36 PDT
quote locked
I do kinda agree, but if i didn't have all these minor glyphs then i would have to carry around regeants for my reincarnation, water walking etc.

Orcish/common dictionary "BUR = An aggressively passionate mating call. "
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 3. Re: Ditch minor glyphs, or give us better ones.   13/10/2009 06:51:02 PDT
quote locked
No moving 4 you!
and btw, i like my Minor glyphs, water walking, underwater breath, no mats is awsome, only 7.5 min cd on my HS is pure love.

u can scrap your minor glyps but i will keep my :O

>8< spider pride
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Tarren Mill
  • 4. Re: Ditch minor glyphs, or give us better ones.   13/10/2009 06:52:08 PDT
quote locked
No. Minor glyphs are there to provide a space for more fun glyphs that don't have any large effect on performance. If there were just 4 slots it wouldn't be possible to use any of them.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Blade's Edge
  • 5. Re: Ditch minor glyphs, or give us better ones.   13/10/2009 06:58:41 PDT
quote locked
Some are useful like the paladin Lay on Hands but most do very little or are just fun. The mage polymorph one, for example, could be an ablility you buy from a scribe instead.; would also give scribes a new revenue stream as most glyphs sell very cheaply.

Reagents are really cheap anyway, and if you look you see I have my glyph for slow fall.

[ Post edited by Someoneelse ]

10
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Aggramar
  • 6. Re: Ditch minor glyphs, or give us better ones.   13/10/2009 07:01:50 PDT
quote locked
They have included minor glyphs to make you think about your decision before glyphing, instead of a straight upgrade like major glyphs most minors have a draw back which make you contemplate on whether or not it will benefit your class/spec.

Minors are different to Majors, its just the way it is :)

p.s.

Its not the cost of reagents that make those glyphs good its the fact that you don't need to remember to pick some up and also not have them taking up space.

[ Post edited by Chakka ]

80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 8. Re: Ditch minor glyphs, or give us better ones.   13/10/2009 07:58:08 PDT
quote locked

Q u o t e:
I don't see the need for most, if not all, minor glyphs. Why dont Blizzard just scap the three minor ones and give us an extra major one then change all glyph types to just glyphs.

Edit: Can I get this moved to the suggestions forum please?


Minor glyphs have minor changes, and that's the way it's supposed to be. They aren't there to make you stronger or more powerful, they're just there to make some things less annoying, like needing reagents or buffs having short durations and high costs.

¡sǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ɹoɟ looɔ ooʇ sı uɐʎolɐʞ
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Quel'Thalas
  • 9. Re: Ditch minor glyphs, or give us better ones.   13/10/2009 09:01:34 PDT
quote locked
Minor glyph - first iteration:- "These glyphs will do something cool that doesn't have any real effect on performance" - Glyph of Penguin, Glyph of Sprint are examples of these.

Second iteration:- "These glyphs will remove reagents from spells that really don't need them, but we want to make sure people have to glyph for it instead so there is an illusion of choice".

Third iteration:- "These glyphs suck, but there has to be something in this slot" / "These glyphs are actually very powerful but are used on very situational abilities".

To be honest, I wish they've stuck to the first one across the board, and just removed the bloody reagents from the spells they were going to glyph anyway.

It doesn't help that glyphs were supposed to involve CHOICE, but the way it currently stands for all the classes I've played, there are so few even vaguely useful minor glyphs that there's no choice at all. Shaman comes out reasonably well, most other classes...don't.

Disagree with me if you want. Argue if you wish. If you do it well, i'll respect you. Insult me, or fail to read what I've said, and I'll assume you are an idiot and proceed with that understanding.
Blizzard Entertainment
View All Posts by This User ignore-inactive
Wryxian
Blizzard Poster
  • 10. Re: Ditch minor glyphs, or give us better ones.   13/10/2009 09:05:53 PDT
quote locked

Q u o t e:
Edit: Can I get this moved to the suggestions forum please?
Sorry, no. You need to repost and accept the agreement when posting in that forum.

Also, since I can't resist... minor glyphs are minor. ;-)

"I am more than a fish, I am more than a man!"

Community Team - English
Forum Nav : Jump To This Forum
Blizzard Entertainment